I read about Jason Roberts earlier this year in Dumbo Feather magazine and was blown away by what he had achieved as an "ordinary person". To cut a long story short, when looking to buy a house with his wife years ago, he realised they could only afford to live in an undesirable part of town. Instead of being put off by that, he made it his mission to make it a better place to live - and he achieved it.
He's a co-founder of Better Block, which is a movement that has spread across the globe that revitalises communities. What they do is pretty cool...look at the Dumbo Feather interview, or the Better Block website, or Jason Roberts's TED talk.
This is a guy whose day job was working in IT, not someone with a degree in town planning. He shows that you don't have to wait to be asked, or for someone else to start...you can do it yourself.
Thoughts about books I’ve read and what they’ve taught me about living a happier, more interesting, more fulfilling life
Thursday, 5 December 2013
Monday, 2 December 2013
How to Change the World
I've been meaning to write about How to Change the World by John-Paul Flintoff for ages as it made a big impression on me. It's from the School of Life series so it's short, to the point and full of ideas. This book is aimed at those of us who like the idea of changing the world in some way, but feel small, ultimately a bit powerless, think it's all too hard and then don't do anything else about it.
The book starts with a chapter on "Overcoming Defeatism" to get us out of this frame of mind and to remind us of the power of ordinary people. If we want to hold a street party and get frustrated by petty regulations, Flintoff says we have a choice - we can either try to change the silly rules or we can just ignore them. He talks about Gene Sharp who compiled an astonishing list of methods of "non violent action" - this sounds a bit alarming I know - but it is basically a very long list of ways of "doing something" (all 198 of them are included in the appendix). Flintoff says:
The book starts with a chapter on "Overcoming Defeatism" to get us out of this frame of mind and to remind us of the power of ordinary people. If we want to hold a street party and get frustrated by petty regulations, Flintoff says we have a choice - we can either try to change the silly rules or we can just ignore them. He talks about Gene Sharp who compiled an astonishing list of methods of "non violent action" - this sounds a bit alarming I know - but it is basically a very long list of ways of "doing something" (all 198 of them are included in the appendix). Flintoff says:
"Sharp demands that we remove our blinkers and recognise that political power is our own power - and that it does not reside only at the ballot box"(Sounds like something Russell Brand would probably agree with based on his recent interview with Jeremy Paxman.)
So - that's the rousing call to action...but for what cause? Flintoff suggests how we can figure out what is important to us - what we actually want to take action on - and how to cultivate a sense of purpose. There are some exercises in the book to help you work through those questions.
Next he suggests taking stock of your personal skills and qualities so you can work out how best you can help with your chosen cause. After reflecting on his own experiences and skills, Flintoff comes up with this (which I love):
The remainder of the book talks about where money fits in, how to get others to help, and changing the world in the wider community. There are lots of inspiring stories about people with great ideas, many of them sounded so simple that I thought, wow, I could do that. I've come across other stories since reading this book that could have come straight from these pages. Just ordinary people doing the sort of world changing things Flintoff talks about in this book.
Next he suggests taking stock of your personal skills and qualities so you can work out how best you can help with your chosen cause. After reflecting on his own experiences and skills, Flintoff comes up with this (which I love):
"I resolved from now on to stop thinking of myself only as a writer. I am also an artist, a baker, a career coach, a carpenter, a cleaner, a cook, a decorator, a dog walker, an English language teacher, a film maker, a gardener, a map maker, a bike messenger, a minicab driver, a qualified first aider, a printer, a publisher, a rubbish collector, a Scout patrol leader, a second hand bookseller, a tailor, a typist, a waiter, a washer up and possibly much else. I have to say that drawing up this list gave quite a boost to my self-esteem."He says there are two ways to change the world - to reduce suffering or to increase pleasure. In the "increasing pleasure" category he talks about art and creativity. He argues that "when we engage creatively with the world, we are having an impact". In his mind, this is not confined to the fine arts, it could be making clothes or playing in a band. Flintoff says
"A good world is not a world where everybody fixates on global problems according to some externally imposed framework of 'importance'. A good world is one in which people find meaning in the particular things they do - and that means a word that has a place for beauty, creativity and play."In a nutshell then, changing the world doesn't have to be serious and heavy - we can have fun doing it too. There are some great examples in the book of art projects and social enterprises, one of them is the Craftivist Collective which uses craft in activism.
The remainder of the book talks about where money fits in, how to get others to help, and changing the world in the wider community. There are lots of inspiring stories about people with great ideas, many of them sounded so simple that I thought, wow, I could do that. I've come across other stories since reading this book that could have come straight from these pages. Just ordinary people doing the sort of world changing things Flintoff talks about in this book.
Monday, 18 November 2013
Happier at Home
I mentioned recently that, in the midst of my house move, I re-read Happier at Home by Gretchen Rubin. Now, I'm a big fan of Gretchen Rubin's writing and became an even bigger fan when it turned out she is also a super nice lady (more on that later). This post has taken me ages to write because Happier at Home is packed with, well, so much stuff, and I just couldn't pin down what I wanted to say. So, in the spirit of "done is better than perfect" (a Gretchen-ism I like to remind myself of regularly), here's a collection of highlights and thoughts about the book.
So - what's it about? Rubin describes the book as her account of the strategies that she used to feel more at home, at home. In contrast to the messages in The Architecture of Happiness, which is all about the physical make up of buildings and their contents, Rubin doesn't really focus on this. She talks about what goes on in (and around) the home, and openly admits that she's not really interested in interior design. In fact, she said it had been a relief to her when she realised that her style of apartment didn't have to reflect any deep truths about her, and that it was enough that it be a pleasant, comfortable place to live.
Each month, Rubin picks a theme related to home (in the broadest sense) and sets herself some resolutions. She kicks off with "Possessions". One of the most unsettling things about moving was being confronted with all our stuff - every single thing needed attention - and it made me just want to chuck it all out. The usual comeback to a comment like this is that, yes, you should get rid of stuff, strive for simplicity, etc etc. Rubin argues we shouldn't just strive for less for the sake of having less, and assuming that less is better. She says instead we should just make sure we are engaging with our stuff - either by using it or keeping it because it has some special significance.
Next up is Marriage month. One of the things Rubin talks about here is an attempt to rebalance who does the driving. Her husband basically does all of it, and she avoids it. This is one of my own weaknesses too, and I read this chapter with hope, but it turns out there are no quick fixes for this. Her sister offers the most helpful bit of wisdom here - that she'll only stop feeling anxious about driving after she has been driving every day for years.
Parenthood was the next theme, and I decided straight away to copy one of her resolutions to "under react to a problem". Making a conscious effort to stay calm definitely makes a difference, but it takes practice.
A couple of months later Rubin focuses on Time. She throws in a quote from Thoreau which inspired her:
After the chapters on Body and Family is a chapter on Neighbourhood. Here Rubin resolves to "be a tourist without leaving home" by making more effort to appreciate and enjoy what her city has to offer. Another resolution this month was to "practice nonrandom acts of kindness". Rubin disagrees with the notion that random acts of kindness bring happiness to the giver and the receiver (who she thinks will usually react with suspicion to a random act of kindness directed at them). The nonrandom acts of kindness that Rubin focuses on include inviting new people to her reading and writing groups, recommending people for work and linking to other people's blogs. I smiled when I read this as this blog has been a lucky recipient of one of Rubin's nonrandom acts of kindness - she posted about this blog on twitter! - and it made my day!
Towards the end of the book, I highlighted this - which sounds so simple but is so insightful:
And, speaking of her Secrets of Adulthood (of which there are many) - this is one of my new favourites:
You can find out more about Gretchen Rubin and her books and read her blog at www.gretchenrubin.com
So - what's it about? Rubin describes the book as her account of the strategies that she used to feel more at home, at home. In contrast to the messages in The Architecture of Happiness, which is all about the physical make up of buildings and their contents, Rubin doesn't really focus on this. She talks about what goes on in (and around) the home, and openly admits that she's not really interested in interior design. In fact, she said it had been a relief to her when she realised that her style of apartment didn't have to reflect any deep truths about her, and that it was enough that it be a pleasant, comfortable place to live.
Each month, Rubin picks a theme related to home (in the broadest sense) and sets herself some resolutions. She kicks off with "Possessions". One of the most unsettling things about moving was being confronted with all our stuff - every single thing needed attention - and it made me just want to chuck it all out. The usual comeback to a comment like this is that, yes, you should get rid of stuff, strive for simplicity, etc etc. Rubin argues we shouldn't just strive for less for the sake of having less, and assuming that less is better. She says instead we should just make sure we are engaging with our stuff - either by using it or keeping it because it has some special significance.
Next up is Marriage month. One of the things Rubin talks about here is an attempt to rebalance who does the driving. Her husband basically does all of it, and she avoids it. This is one of my own weaknesses too, and I read this chapter with hope, but it turns out there are no quick fixes for this. Her sister offers the most helpful bit of wisdom here - that she'll only stop feeling anxious about driving after she has been driving every day for years.
Parenthood was the next theme, and I decided straight away to copy one of her resolutions to "under react to a problem". Making a conscious effort to stay calm definitely makes a difference, but it takes practice.
A couple of months later Rubin focuses on Time. She throws in a quote from Thoreau which inspired her:
"I love a broad margin to my life"Isn't it such a luxury not to have to rush? In this chapter Rubin talks about planning her time better. She talks about everything from managing always-on technology and relentless emails, to how much she accomplished by doing something 15 minutes a day, to her kids' after school activities. Her "15 minutes a day" task was sorting out her digital photos. Some of her zeal for this rubbed off on me and I started tackling mine too. I also made a mental note to read Samuel Johnson, who is glowingly discussed in this chapter.
After the chapters on Body and Family is a chapter on Neighbourhood. Here Rubin resolves to "be a tourist without leaving home" by making more effort to appreciate and enjoy what her city has to offer. Another resolution this month was to "practice nonrandom acts of kindness". Rubin disagrees with the notion that random acts of kindness bring happiness to the giver and the receiver (who she thinks will usually react with suspicion to a random act of kindness directed at them). The nonrandom acts of kindness that Rubin focuses on include inviting new people to her reading and writing groups, recommending people for work and linking to other people's blogs. I smiled when I read this as this blog has been a lucky recipient of one of Rubin's nonrandom acts of kindness - she posted about this blog on twitter! - and it made my day!
Towards the end of the book, I highlighted this - which sounds so simple but is so insightful:
"...my quest perfectly illustrated one of my Secrets of Adulthood: I do best what comes naturally. When I pursue a goal that's right for me, my progress comes quickly and easily; when I pursue a goal that's wrong for me, my progress feels blocked. Now I try not to fight that sense of paralysis, but rather see it as a helpful clue to self-knowledge."
And, speaking of her Secrets of Adulthood (of which there are many) - this is one of my new favourites:
"It's the task that's never started that's the most wearisome"The final chapter, Now, brings it all together as Rubin reflects on her months of resolutions. I won't spoil the ending except to say that it's happy and quite lovely.
You can find out more about Gretchen Rubin and her books and read her blog at www.gretchenrubin.com
Tuesday, 5 November 2013
The Architecture of Happiness
The last few weeks have been spent trying to adjust to life in a new home. For the last 3 years we lived in a lovely 2 bedroom apartment within walking distance of everything we needed to get to. We were complimented on it often and I guess we felt quite house proud - not least because it was the first home we ever owned. But with 2 small kids we'd grown out of it and desperately needed some more (especially outdoor) space.
We've moved about one mile away to the suburbs (where nothing is within walking distance) to an unrenovated 1950s house with a dodgy green carpet and a big back garden for the kids. We're renting this place so we just have to accept it as it is. This whole experience has made me wonder about how much our sense of identity is wrapped up in where we live - both what our homes are like and where they are.
The Architecture of Happiness by Alain de Botton gave me some insight into that. Early on in the book he says,
The Architecture of Happiness is quite wide ranging in the topics it covers, and although I generally love most of what Alain de Botton writes I find I have to be in the mood for it. This book felt a bit too dense to be tackling in the middle of this busy patch - however, there was a great chapter on "Ideals of Home" which I paid close attention to. One of my favourite passages was about the meaning of home:
In this same chapter on the Ideals of Home, de Botton also talks about what's in our homes. He makes some interesting arguments about what drives our taste in art, furniture and interior design, and why our tastes change or, as he asks, "Why do we change our minds about what we find beautiful?"
He argues that "a given stylistic choice will tell us as much about what its advocates lack as about what they like". He says that in the late 18th Century in the West, there was an increase in popularity of "the natural" in all major art forms and he explains "They were falling in love with the natural in their art precisely because they were losing touch with the natural in their own lives".
On why our tastes change, he says:
We've moved about one mile away to the suburbs (where nothing is within walking distance) to an unrenovated 1950s house with a dodgy green carpet and a big back garden for the kids. We're renting this place so we just have to accept it as it is. This whole experience has made me wonder about how much our sense of identity is wrapped up in where we live - both what our homes are like and where they are.
The Architecture of Happiness by Alain de Botton gave me some insight into that. Early on in the book he says,
"Belief in the significance of architecture is premised on the notion that we are, for better or worse, different people in different places - and on the conviction that it is architecture's task to render vivid to us who we might ideally be."Instead of proudly showing people around, as we did in our old place, my husband and I have been the first to make jokes about the decor and apologise for the horrible bathroom. It's like we're saying - this isn't really us! Don't judge us! But of course our friends couldn't care less about these things. Now that we've been here for a while though I don't care about them either.
The Architecture of Happiness is quite wide ranging in the topics it covers, and although I generally love most of what Alain de Botton writes I find I have to be in the mood for it. This book felt a bit too dense to be tackling in the middle of this busy patch - however, there was a great chapter on "Ideals of Home" which I paid close attention to. One of my favourite passages was about the meaning of home:
"To speak of home in relation to a building is simply to recognise its harmony with our own prized internal song...We need our rooms to align us to desirable versions of ourselves and to keep alive the important, evanescent sides of us."I also liked this passage, which highlights the idea of home as a sanctuary where we can be our true selves (although his comments about work are very amusingly cynical).
"Our working routines may be frantic and compromised, dense with meetings, insincere handshakes, small-talk and bureaucracy. We may say things we don't believe in to win over our colleagues and feel ourselves becoming envious and excited in relation to goals we don't essentially care for.
But finally, on our own, looking out of the hall window into the garden and the gathering darkness, we can slowly resume contact with a more authentic self, who was there waiting in the wings for us to end our performance."
In this same chapter on the Ideals of Home, de Botton also talks about what's in our homes. He makes some interesting arguments about what drives our taste in art, furniture and interior design, and why our tastes change or, as he asks, "Why do we change our minds about what we find beautiful?"
He argues that "a given stylistic choice will tell us as much about what its advocates lack as about what they like". He says that in the late 18th Century in the West, there was an increase in popularity of "the natural" in all major art forms and he explains "They were falling in love with the natural in their art precisely because they were losing touch with the natural in their own lives".
On why our tastes change, he says:
"As the ways in which we are unbalanced alters, so our attention will continue to be drawn to new parts of the spectrum of taste, to new styles which we will declare beautiful on the basis that they embody in a concentrated form what now lies in shadow within us."
As I look around our new home and see all our treasured possessions in new places, our pieces of furniture in new rooms, our art and photos on the walls, I think about how much we love all this stuff. I've never thought about why I love the things I love in my home, or why we chose the things we did, but maybe he's right and these choices reveal some deep truths about what's lacking somewhere in life? I wonder...
Friday, 1 November 2013
Blown off course
The last month has been completely full of non blogging activities and I have been feeling bad about that. There was something so fulfilling about writing down my thoughts about the books I was reading, having an outlet outside of work and domestic life, and feeling like my mind really was growing. I have been blown off course by a series of events and the fog this created in my brain has taken a while to clear.
In the last month, we've sold our apartment and moved to a new house. We've bought a new car and soon afterwards crashed it, then got it fixed...we've had a health issue with my son, subsequently confirmed to be not actually a real concern. My husband has stopped working to take on the kids, and I have been very very busy at work. I had 3 days off work during all of this and, on the first day back in the office, I burst into tears at my desk. I know this was down to a build up of stress, but it was so disappointing to be feeling that way. Despite feeling so clear headed and rational before all this, it didn't take much to tip the balance.
Anyway...in the midst of this I have been reading and thinking. I've read The Architecture of Happiness by Alain de Botton to try to understand my thoughts about moving house, and adjusting to a completely different type of home. I've been re-reading Happier at Home by Gretchen Rubin and How to Change the World by John Paul Flintoff. I also loved the Russell Brand interview with Jeremy Paxman and an inspirational article by the late wife of my friend Omar.
I will be writing about all of this stuff soon. It even feels good to be writing this. I'm relieved things have finally settled down.
In the last month, we've sold our apartment and moved to a new house. We've bought a new car and soon afterwards crashed it, then got it fixed...we've had a health issue with my son, subsequently confirmed to be not actually a real concern. My husband has stopped working to take on the kids, and I have been very very busy at work. I had 3 days off work during all of this and, on the first day back in the office, I burst into tears at my desk. I know this was down to a build up of stress, but it was so disappointing to be feeling that way. Despite feeling so clear headed and rational before all this, it didn't take much to tip the balance.
Anyway...in the midst of this I have been reading and thinking. I've read The Architecture of Happiness by Alain de Botton to try to understand my thoughts about moving house, and adjusting to a completely different type of home. I've been re-reading Happier at Home by Gretchen Rubin and How to Change the World by John Paul Flintoff. I also loved the Russell Brand interview with Jeremy Paxman and an inspirational article by the late wife of my friend Omar.
I will be writing about all of this stuff soon. It even feels good to be writing this. I'm relieved things have finally settled down.
Wednesday, 9 October 2013
Hacking your Education
I've had my nose stuck in Hacking your Education by Dale J Stephens since I wrote my last post. It's aimed at young people contemplating university, and I've already been, so I've been reading out of curiosity rather than to learn tips to apply to my life. Was it still a worthwhile read? Yes...
In a nutshell, the book is pretty much a "how to" guide for any young person who wants to map out their own path outside the traditional (and expensive) university route and get a great job or start their own business at the end of it. It's full of case studies of friends and acquaintances who, for whatever reason, didn't attend university at all or dropped out and made successes of themselves through grit, determination, good luck and a fair amount of blagging and hustling.
Stephens thinks there are 3 main reasons why we go to university: the social experience, to get a job, and to learn for learning's sake. He argues we can get these things in the real world, without having to pay out for university and have more fun in the process.
So far, so good. But how? Stephens has tonnes of suggestions. Figure out what you're really interested in. Commit to learning outside the classroom. Make a to-learn list, find someone or a group of people to keep you accountable, and put yourself out there (he suggests setting up a personal website that becomes your online portfolio of experiences). Learn in groups with other like minded people. Figure out your talents and how you learn best. Find mentors and teachers. Network, have lots of coffees. Use technology, become a writer or a programmer! Gate crash conferences and university lectures! Take advantage of free educational resources. Have your 2 minute pitch ready! Start up a company. Travel the world! Don't pursue traditional jobs through traditional routes (never send in your CV!). Get a job through your network. They'll call you! (Well, sort of - that happened to some of the people in the case studies). Phew. As he says at the start, this is not a book about dropping out and taking the easy option.
What did I learn from all of this? Well, I had no idea that universities like MIT in the US had made their course materials available for free online (yes, really! See here). Not only that, you can listen to university lectures on iTunes U, including from Harvard, which I think is pretty amazing. I'm tempted to take a few modules... Also the case studies in Hacking your Education are full of examples of young people basically designing their own jobs, just as Roman Krznaric suggests in How to Find Fulfilling Work. It's reinforcing the message to put aside other people's expectations and do your own thing.
On reflection, it made me realise that there are loads of examples of people who have "hacked their education". Dynamo the magician (who I wrote about here) could quite easily have been a case study in this book. Someone else I'm a fan of, the writer Caitlin Moran, could have been too - she educated herself in her local library and subsequently blagged her way to becoming a writer. Also, these twin sisters taught themselves to embroider by watching youtube videos and are now sought after artists. I find these stories so inspiring. You can learn anything you want! It's all out there waiting for you.
In a nutshell, the book is pretty much a "how to" guide for any young person who wants to map out their own path outside the traditional (and expensive) university route and get a great job or start their own business at the end of it. It's full of case studies of friends and acquaintances who, for whatever reason, didn't attend university at all or dropped out and made successes of themselves through grit, determination, good luck and a fair amount of blagging and hustling.
Stephens thinks there are 3 main reasons why we go to university: the social experience, to get a job, and to learn for learning's sake. He argues we can get these things in the real world, without having to pay out for university and have more fun in the process.
So far, so good. But how? Stephens has tonnes of suggestions. Figure out what you're really interested in. Commit to learning outside the classroom. Make a to-learn list, find someone or a group of people to keep you accountable, and put yourself out there (he suggests setting up a personal website that becomes your online portfolio of experiences). Learn in groups with other like minded people. Figure out your talents and how you learn best. Find mentors and teachers. Network, have lots of coffees. Use technology, become a writer or a programmer! Gate crash conferences and university lectures! Take advantage of free educational resources. Have your 2 minute pitch ready! Start up a company. Travel the world! Don't pursue traditional jobs through traditional routes (never send in your CV!). Get a job through your network. They'll call you! (Well, sort of - that happened to some of the people in the case studies). Phew. As he says at the start, this is not a book about dropping out and taking the easy option.
In the book he also talks about Peter Thiel, the tech entrepreneur and co-founder of PayPal, who set up the Thiel Fellowship in 2010 to give grants to people under 20 to spur them to quit college and pursue their own ventures (Stephens is part of this programme). This quote from Thiel made me think back to my post on expectations:
"The problem that exists with schooling is that it ends up convincing most people that they're mediocre, and then the talented people get regrouped and are forced to compete with each other, and then most of them get convinced they're mediocre as well, and you sort of cycle and repeat, until people's dreams and aspirations are badly beaten out of them over time."
What did I learn from all of this? Well, I had no idea that universities like MIT in the US had made their course materials available for free online (yes, really! See here). Not only that, you can listen to university lectures on iTunes U, including from Harvard, which I think is pretty amazing. I'm tempted to take a few modules... Also the case studies in Hacking your Education are full of examples of young people basically designing their own jobs, just as Roman Krznaric suggests in How to Find Fulfilling Work. It's reinforcing the message to put aside other people's expectations and do your own thing.
On reflection, it made me realise that there are loads of examples of people who have "hacked their education". Dynamo the magician (who I wrote about here) could quite easily have been a case study in this book. Someone else I'm a fan of, the writer Caitlin Moran, could have been too - she educated herself in her local library and subsequently blagged her way to becoming a writer. Also, these twin sisters taught themselves to embroider by watching youtube videos and are now sought after artists. I find these stories so inspiring. You can learn anything you want! It's all out there waiting for you.
Sunday, 6 October 2013
Is rejecting formal education the new fashion?
I wrote a post on Thoreau's thoughts on learning recently (you can see it here) and I have been thinking about it a lot since. He questions the role of formal education and makes the case for learning by doing, and teaching yourself.
I am a pretty straight laced sort of person and I like to stick to the rules (even if they are silly), which sometimes winds my (much more free spirited) husband up. I followed the conventional education route and have worked in steady jobs ever since leaving university.
Since reading Walden, Thoreau's ideas about learning have been on my mind and, as a consequence, I have noticed some interesting articles that wouldn't have been on my radar otherwise.
One of these was on a blog, zenhabits, which I stumbled across a couple of weeks ago. It is one of the most popular blogs on the internet. The writer, Leo Babauta, has 6 children and is a proponent of unschooling. He has an entire blog devoted to it, Unschoolery. He makes the case for self directed learning, but also offers some insights for teachers to help them unschool their regular classroom.
I also followed a link from John Armstrong's website to wired.co.uk which, coincidentally, had a Q&A with Dale Stephens, founder of the Uncollege movement. Stephens has written a book, called Hacking your Education, which I have also added to my reading list. The article says Uncollege
Is the point of education having the certificate at the end of it or the knowledge? Or is the knowledge enough?
I am a pretty straight laced sort of person and I like to stick to the rules (even if they are silly), which sometimes winds my (much more free spirited) husband up. I followed the conventional education route and have worked in steady jobs ever since leaving university.
Since reading Walden, Thoreau's ideas about learning have been on my mind and, as a consequence, I have noticed some interesting articles that wouldn't have been on my radar otherwise.
One of these was on a blog, zenhabits, which I stumbled across a couple of weeks ago. It is one of the most popular blogs on the internet. The writer, Leo Babauta, has 6 children and is a proponent of unschooling. He has an entire blog devoted to it, Unschoolery. He makes the case for self directed learning, but also offers some insights for teachers to help them unschool their regular classroom.
I also followed a link from John Armstrong's website to wired.co.uk which, coincidentally, had a Q&A with Dale Stephens, founder of the Uncollege movement. Stephens has written a book, called Hacking your Education, which I have also added to my reading list. The article says Uncollege
"encourages students to be self-directed learners and to create a 'learning community in the real world' that breaks the 'dichotomy between education and life.'"This has some real parallels with the youtube video I mentioned in my post On Expectations recently, that is, school and life shouldn't feel like two separate worlds.
Is the point of education having the certificate at the end of it or the knowledge? Or is the knowledge enough?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)